Strategy - Succession Planning and Leadership
Assessment of CEO knowledge concentration, management resilience, and strategic bottlenecks.
CEO Role: What’s Concentrated
Knowledge and decisions held by CEO (Mat):
- High-level finances and forecasting
- Shareholder relationships and communications
- Government correspondence (ASIC, ATO, Liquor Licensing)
- External accountant relationships
- Strategic decision-making across all domains
Resilience Assessment
If CEO unavailable for 2 weeks:
- Main risk: Government communications would be the critical bottleneck
- Low risk areas: Everything else. Staff carried on fine when CEO was away 3 weeks previously
Implication: Role is not entirely CEO-dependent, but government correspondence is a genuine knowledge concentration point.
Management Layer: Current Constraints
Current state (as of March 2026):
- No formal manager handover protocol
- Venue Manager (Monique Anderson) doing 16-hour shifts (setup → shift → close)
- Unsustainable and prevents manager from learning or stepping up
Risks:
- Burnout: Single manager at risk of burnout from extreme shift length
- Continuity: No depth in management. If manager unavailable, there is no backup.
- Growth: Manager cannot develop leadership skills, mentoring, or strategic thinking while in execution-only mode
Strategic Bottlenecks: Pain Points
Pain Point 1: CEO Bottleneck Across the Board
Issue: CEO is the point of approval/decision for too many daily and strategic decisions
Root cause: Better systems and automation would reduce the need for CEO input
Mitigation strategy:
- Implement automated reporting so decisions can be made by others
- Document decision criteria and approval thresholds clearly
- Delegate financial reporting responsibility to VM
Pain Point 2: Financial Situation and Strategy Held by CEO
Issue: Company strategy, budgeting processes, and financial outlook not clearly communicated to VM and Event Leads
Risk: Staff work in the dark; decisions are reactive rather than aligned to strategy
Mitigation strategy:
- Create weekly/monthly P&L and cash flow reports transparent to leadership team
- Hold regular planning meetings where financial data is shared
- Define clear goals and KPIs (e.g., “Target AUD $25k/week revenue”)
Action Plan
Immediate (Sprint 1)
-
Document government correspondence process:
- What letters arrive, from whom, what are the deadlines?
- Who approves responses? What is the approval workflow?
- Identify secondary person to act if CEO unavailable
-
Implement shared financial reporting:
- Build weekly P&L and cash forecasts (automated from Xero/Square)
- Share with VM and Event Leads every Monday
- Hold weekly 30-minute sync to discuss financial position and decisions
-
Reduce manager shift length:
- Review current 16-hour shift pattern
- Identify whether necessary or scheduling inefficiency
- Implement sustainable shift length and cross-train second person
Medium Term (Sprint 2+)
-
Build decision frameworks:
- Create thresholds: “VM can approve spend up to AUD $X without CEO approval”
- Document approval workflows for common decisions (hiring, events, supplier changes)
-
Develop succession bench:
- Identify one person to shadow CEO on government correspondence and shareholder relations
- Provide shadowing and training for 4–6 weeks
-
Automate repetitive CEO tasks:
- Invoicing, payroll, email triage (all identified in Automation Opportunities)
- Directly reduces CEO input requirements
Key Success Metrics
- Manager shift length reduced to sustainable level
- Weekly P&L shared with leadership team every Monday
- At least one person can draft ATO/ASIC correspondence with minimal CEO review
- CEO reports spending <20 hours per week on operational approvals (down from current, likely 30+)
Related Pages
- Succession Planning — concept page with strategic decisions
- CEO Bottleneck — detailed analysis of decision concentration
- Automation Opportunities — systems and processes to reduce CEO input